The numbers, side by side
| Metric | Chicago | Minneapolis | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost-of-living index | 112 | 110 | -2 |
| 1-bed rent (avg) | $1,700 | $1,550 | -$150 |
| 2-bed rent (avg) | $2,200 | $2,000 | -$200 |
| Median household income | $58,984 | $62,456 | +$3,472 |
| Population | 2,693,976 | 429,954 | -2,264,022 |
What salary you'd need in Minneapolis
To maintain your Chicago purchasing power, here's what you'd need to earn in Minneapolis.
Chicago vs Minneapolis: which makes more sense for you?
On paper, Chicago's cost-of-living index of 112 runs roughly 1.8% higher than Minneapolis's 110. But that headline number papers over real differences in how that cost is distributed — rent might be far more expensive while groceries and transit costs run closer to even.
The rent gap
A 1-bedroom apartment in Chicago averages $1,700/month, vs $1,550/month in Minneapolis — a -$150 difference. For 2-bedrooms, the gap widens to -$200/month. Over a year, the rent difference alone is $1,800 on a 1-bed.
Income context
Median household income in Chicago is $58,984, while Minneapolis runs $62,456 (+$3,472 difference). That matters for how the cost-of-living gap actually feels day-to-day — if local salaries are also higher, the cost difference washes out partly. If local salaries lag the cost-of-living gap, your paycheck buys noticeably less.
State tax differences
Chicago is in Illinois and Minneapolis is in Minnesota, so you'll also pick up a state-tax difference. Tax-free states like Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Washington, and Nevada deliver real take-home upside even when nominal salaries are similar.